Talk:Intelectin-1
Add topicLatest comment: 10 years ago by Mark viking in topic Page deletion
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Page deletion
[edit]Should Wikipedia delete this ITLN-1 page as well as the intelectin-2 page? The same information with a more comprehensive, and expanding, analysis of the subject is available on the intelectin page. Despite being the top hit when someone google for intelectin, these two pages are practically not scientifically valuable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kwangkanont (talk • contribs) 16:55, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
- I think a merge/redirect is the better course of action here. Please see my reply at Talk:Intelectin_2 for my reasoning. For this article, there is not much prose, but what there is, is referenced and the refs in the further reading section might be useful to merge as well. If not, the article history will still remain for the time when this protein becomes independently notable. --Mark viking (talk) 21:08, 27 February 2016 (UTC)