Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a23bae815bdcd319

Jump to content

Talk:Intel system development kit

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 3 years ago by MaterialWorks in topic Requested move 23 July 2023

The SDK-86 Price

[edit]

The sentence "It was sold as a single board kit at a cheaper price than a single 8086 chip because Intel thought that the success of a microprocessor depends on its evaluation by as many users as possible" contradicts the later given price of $780. The MSRP of the 8086 was around $200. Meritous (talk) 20:16, 20 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 23 July 2023

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover)MaterialWorks 18:51, 30 July 2023 (UTC)Reply


Intel System Development KitIntel system development kit – Moved to caps without discussion in 2010, the term "system development kit" is used generically here, for a wide class of products from Intel. It is far from consistently capped in sources, and when it is, it's usually either for explaining the SDK initialism or as part of a more specific product name. It should be reverted to lowercase here. Dicklyon (talk) 15:58, 23 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.