Talk:Intel Quark
Add topic| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Intel Quark article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Instruction set
[edit]I read somewhere that these CPUs lack support for many instruction set extensions, even old ones like MMX. I'd appreciate if someone can add information about this to the article (with proper sources etc. of course). 200.127.94.49 (talk) 20:03, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
- These CPUs are almost identical to an original Pentium (P54C/i586) before the MMX era. They are very good CPUs for the price and their small size and powerage (power utilization), but you need to only run i486 or i586 code on them and avoid i686 (Pentium Pro) or MMX code. Sofia Koutsouveli (talk) 22:32, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Only support embedded operating systems
[edit]Debian is an embedded operating system? HughesJohn (talk) 10:04, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
Only support embedded operating systems
[edit]This is very inaccurate. What this expression mean ? This processor has MMU so it can run Linux as well as any other fully featured modern operating system. If Windows does not support it it does not mean that this processor only runs "embedded system".
What is the reason of: "The L2 cache column shows the size of the L1 cache" ?
[edit]What is the reason of: "The L2 cache column shows the size of the L1 cache" ? why not change column text? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.100.3.106 (talk) 14:06, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Segfault Bug
[edit]Article says "x1000 contains...". Do the others (x1001 and so on) contain that bug as well or has it been fixed? Anyhow, X1000 is one year older than the others. --62.48.72.147 (talk) 08:33, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Intel Quark. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140108103003/http://www.eejournal.com/archives/articles/20131016-quark/ to http://www.eejournal.com/archives/articles/20131016-quark/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:19, 14 November 2017 (UTC)