Talk:Integrated modular avionics

Typhoon

Eurofighter Typhoon does not use an IMA as it is defined on this page.

But it does use an IMA with ASAAC software stack though. http://www.dglr.de/index.php?id=717#c1477 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.131.254.96 (talk) 03:01, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

Classification

I think there is enough elements to reclassify it as start-class now. Hervegirod (talk) 09:41, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

"Talk: page" discussions should be here -- NOT in the article!

There are (at least) two places in the "== History ==" section of this article (Integrated_modular_avionics#History), where discussions were inserted, that belong here on the "Talk:" page, NOT there, in the Wikipedia article. [quotes:] "(incorrect statement [...])", and "This statement is incorrect.".

Now, I am not saying that these assertions are wrong. They might be right. But the question of "right or wrong" is outside the scope of my comments today. The question of "Article or Talk page" is the topic of my comments today. It appears that someone failed to use the "Talk:" page, -- perhaps because of failing to realize that being bold, and just deleting "incorrect" statement[s], and adding correct ones, does NOT completely remove the previous versions from the "history" of the article. The person who did so, might be new to Wikipedia. If so, welcome to Wikipedia, and, from now on, when in Article space, do as the Wikipedians do, and just correct stuff that is wrong; and if you must add "comments", like "(incorrect statement [...])", and "This statement is incorrect.", then those belong [here] on the "Talk:" page.

Thank you! --Mike Schwartz (talk) 03:52, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Here are the two "discussions" (removed from the article):

(incorrect statement. A version of IMA known as AIMS was certified for the Boeing 777 in 1995)

This statement is incorrect. IMA did not migrate to the commercial arena from the business and regional jet arena. Honeywell developed an IMA for the Boeing 777 in the early 90's. The system was known as the Airplane Information Management System (AIMS). This version of IMA preceded Primus Epic by several years. And to be clear, the IMA systems flying on the A380 and the 787 are based on AIMS, not the Primus Epic version of IMA.

However, I replaced both with 'failed verification' tags... the citations do not provide a clear history of IMA, and there is no IMA 'standard'208.65.20.141 (talk) 01:50, 24 September 2011 (UTC)