Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2330328691fb36e

Jump to content

Talk:Injunctive mood

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 7 years ago by 2804:54:15FF:6C01:A16D:FAF9:F65A:EB17
 Preceding unsigned comment added by 2804:54:15FF:6C01:A16D:FAF9:F65A:EB17 (talk) 22:51, 29 November 2018 (UTC)Reply


the article should start by defining the word "injunctive".

I don't understand

[edit]

índrasya nú vīryā̀ṇi prá vocam is translated Indra's heroic deeds will/shall I now declaim, that's pretty clear. But the article is about injunctive mood, and which words are the nouns, which are verbs, and on which verb is the injunctive mood applied? Is índrasya, Indra's or by convention in this position Indra's deeds. Vocam is by my nonbold guess I say, but the rest? ... Twirling his moustaches, does: Rursus 10:07, 10 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

If you're looking for a breakdown of the phrase:

indrasya - gen. sg. of indra: "of Indra"

nu - ind. "now"

vīryāṇi - acc. pl. of vīrya: "heroic deeds"

pra - upas. pref., typically prefixed to verbs to denote the beginning of an action

vocam - 1 sg. P. inj. of vac: "(I) do extol"

"Now do I extol the heroic deeds of Indra..."

Get a copy of Macdonell's A Vedic Grammar for Students and review §215. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.56.75.80 (talk) 05:08, 31 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Occam's Razor – here?

[edit]

Occam's Razor shouldn't be here. It's a tool for minimizing and clarifying theories and reasonings before presenting them to a public (or for oneselves). It's not a truth finding tool, since reality provides us mostly with vague and weak correlations where the directions of implication are ambiguous. Consider the 19th century rich German farms, their childbirth productivity, and the presence of the storks at the roof of the farms. Occam's Razor says that childbirth produces storks, or that storks produces children. Common sense says otherwise. Twirling his moustaches, does: Rursus 10:16, 10 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

I read the article and concluded this too. I'm glad someone else agrees with me. I'll remove it. Ufwuct (talk) 18:14, 4 January 2012 (UTC)Reply