Talk:Information good
Add topic | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Origins
[edit]Hey, can someone point me to the origin of this thought: "In information goods, the valuable part is a pattern in which the material is arranged - the arrangement of ink on paper, paint on canvas, magnetic elements on a tape, a series of dents (pits) on a compact disc, etc. " Is it found in Boyle?
commodity
[edit]Information good in economics and law is a type commodity ... Is what? Information goods are not commodities, isn't it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kitfox.it (talk • contribs) 19:20, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
I would hope the debate about information goods has been advanced somewhat in the last few years? Also, how about explaining the difference between information and information goods? Finally, the content is light and could do with more references to boost its credibility. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.89.58.131 (talk) 09:02, 30 January 2012 (UTC)