Talk:Influence peddling
Add topic| While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ripped off
[edit]Seems to be ripped off from here: http://www.bartleby.com/61/29/I0132900.html
Is this legal? Am I confused? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.107.216.162 (talk) 23:35, 26 May 2004 (UTC)
- An archive version suggests www.bartleby.com/ republished their information from The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition. which is Copyright © 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company. and was published by the Houghton Mifflin Company, with all rights reserved. This article has since been taken down from their website, and the Wikipedia article has since been changed. Is it legal? Depends on whether bartleb.com licenced their content and where Wikipedia editors sourced their content from. Although the article has been changed, the source of the information still lacks a citation. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 23:53, 28 February 2026 (UTC)
Dictionary entry?
[edit]This seems to be more of a definition of a word rather than an encyclopedia article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dough007 (talk • contribs) 00:09, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
Lead section has extra information
[edit]I have tagged this article for clean-up because the lead section has extra information defining influence peddling, and where it is illegal, that doesn't appear in the rest of the article. See MOS:LEAD for purpose of the lead. It should provide an accessible overview to the whole article. Information in the lead should be expanded upon in the body of the article, too. As it stands, without the lead, this article is just a list of examples that doesn't explain what influence peddling is or why it is not thought desirable by some. See WP:LEADFOLLOWSBODY Cameron Dewe (talk) 23:59, 28 February 2026 (UTC)
Edit Request
[edit]| The user below has a request that an edit be made to Influence peddling. That user has been partially blocked from editing it. There are currently 49 requests waiting for review. Please read the instructions for the parameters used by this template for accepting and declining them, and review the request below and make the edit if it is well sourced, neutral, and follows other Wikipedia guidelines and policies. Remember to set the |answered= parameter to "yes" when the request has been accepted, rejected or on hold awaiting user input. |
- What I think should be changed :
In the Known cases section:
| − | + | President Donald Trump commuted Blagojevich's sentence in February 2020 and pardoned him in February 2025. |
- Why it should be changed:
Corrects the clemency history and dates.
- References supporting the possible change:
Clemency Grants by President Donald J. Trump (2025-Present) Commutations granted by President Donald J. Trump (2017 - 2021)
Goldenpen1 (talk) 16:40, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
References
- Start-Class Crime-related articles
- Low-importance Crime-related articles
- WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography articles
- Start-Class law articles
- Low-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- Start-Class politics articles
- Low-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- Wikipedia partial-block edit requests