Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22702185f5f8682

Jump to content

Talk:Infant cognitive development

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Sylveon2603 in topic Possible edits

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 27 August 2018 and 17 December 2018. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): JLociel.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:29, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Editing

[edit]

There were a few gramatical errors that I fixed but over all this article was well writen. Hr168407 (talk) 15:44, 29 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Improper Redirect

[edit]

"Common-sense metaphysics" currently redirects here, it should actually be redirected to "Scottish School of Common Sense"; the philosophical idea of common sense has nothing to do with infant cognition, it has everything to do with Thomas Reid (and others in that school).

can this be changed? RCNARANJA 17:05, 19 April 2009 (UTC)Reply


Motricity is mentioned...

[edit]

A definition of the word motricity would be nice. The word is under the paragraph titled Piaget. "According to Jean Piaget's theory of development, the first stage of Cognitive development, (the Sensorimotor Stage) when the infant is 0–4 years old, is where an infant or child will use perception and motricity to identify the objects." Further clarification is necessary for a better understanding. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.83.15.2 (talk) 01:48, 11 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Overall Evaluation of topic

[edit]

This is just a section I am starting to evaluate this topic as a whole. I feel this topic can be improved. Starting mainly with the section "Piaget." This could be expanded upon with possible examples of research that have been done. I feel this page as a wholw needs more information about it's topics. While there is information about all the key elements, they are only briefly described, even though there is much more information about them.and I will be doing my part to make these improvements the best I can. (Stephen Becker (talk) 20:58, 22 June 2011 (UTC))Reply

Sounds Good --MTHarden (talk) 14:08, 28 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

List of Research

[edit]

This is a list of sources that I plan on using while editing this page.

- Woodward, Amanda, and Amy Needham. Learning and the Infant Mind. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2009. Print.

- Hockenbury, Don H., and Sandra E. Hockenbury. Discovering Psychology. New York: Worth, 2007. Print .

- "Child Care Linked To Assertive, Noncompliant, and Aggressive Behaviors Vast Majority of Children Within Normal Range." NICHD - The Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Official Home Page. Web. 05 July 2011. <http://www.nichd.nih.gov/news/releases/child_care.cfm>.

Stephen Becker (talk) 19:35, 5 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Possible edits

[edit]

I'm looking at adding to this Wikipedia page. I have written sections on the development of empathy and theory of mind, adding explanation to the Piaget section and added a section on cultural differences in development. Can I get this checked over before I publish? Sylveon2603 (talk) 16:49, 10 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hi Sylveon2603, I have looked around on your page but I cannot see which edits specifically you would like to make. However, if your edits are well-written and based on reliable sources, I would advise you to be bold and simply make one edit and see how it goes. Worst case scenario, you'll be reverted. In that case, try to learn from it. If all goes well, continue to edit. Happy editing! Lova Falk (talk) 14:11, 15 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thank you @Lova Falk! I added my edits a little while ago and they haven't been reverted, just edited here and there for clean up. Hopefully it adds to the page well. Sylveon2603 (talk) 16:39, 30 April 2025 (UTC)Reply