Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22ea9634b25d96e

Jump to content

Talk:Indicud

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 12 years ago by WikiRedactor in topic GA Review

Edit request on 9 April 2013

[edit]

"Solo Dolo Part II" actually samples "Going the Distance" by the same band, not "The Traitor." 150.216.111.11 (talk) 22:56, 9 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Provide a reliable source to support your change. STATic message me! 20:39, 10 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Edit request on 10 April 2013

[edit]

Tenthbrett (talk) 18:57, 10 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Please specify what you want to change, not copy the entire article on the talk page. STATic message me! 20:39, 10 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Solo Dolo PT II not written by Michels, Brenneck, Guy

[edit]

Solo Dolo Pt II contains a sample of Menahan Street Band's cover of "Going The Distance" originally written by Bill Conti.

Bill Conti should be credited as a writer w/ Mescudi and Duckworth, not Michels, Brenneck, and Guy.

See BMI registration here: http://repertoire.bmi.com/title.asp?blnWriter=True&blnPublisher=True&blnArtist=True&page=1&keyid=15404156&ShowNbr=0&ShowSeqNbr=0&querytype=WorkID — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.79.190.150 (talk) 17:49, 17 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Indicud/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: WikiRedactor (talk · contribs) 17:27, 13 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

General
  • One external link to address.
  • Can you organize the references in columns of three instead of two?
  • When discussing chart positions, can you write out "number X" instead of "#X"?
  • A "Release history" section would be nice to have at the end of the article.
  • Please make sure that every citation has an access date.
  • When I checked it was one link from Amazon.com, but the link works fine for me and it doesn't seem to redirect or anything, so I think it will be fine to leave it as-is.
Introduction
  • Can you touch on the musical styles in one of the paragraphs? That would be good information to have at quick glance.
Background
  • Can you find another way to write "to say the least" that sounds more formal?
  • Similarly, maybe "uncharacteristic" (or something of that nature) can be a more neutral way to say "surprisingly".
Recording and production
  • Since this section is so long, maybe you can break it up into separate "Recording" and "Production" sections? I figured that the former could focus more on the fact that he was back in the studio and reaching out to new collaborators, while the latter can talk about his focus on production values and the movie inspiration stuff.
  • Instead of saying "Indicud MC", it would be better to just say Kid Cudi or Cudi.
Release and promotion
  • Looks good to me!
Singles
  • It looks like every mention of a chart position needs a citation to verify them.
Commercial performance
  • To give this section a little bit more meat, can you make prose out of all of the chart positions listed in the "Charts" position?
  • You'll also need to find another reference for the UK chart position in this section, since the Complex citation only talks about the U.S.
Critical response
  • Can you paraphrase some of the longer quotes?
Track listing
  • You should mention that the songwriting/production credits are pulled from the liner notes.
  • When you add in the official liner notes reference, it won't be necessary to have those questionable WhoSampled sources.
Personnel

Overall, the article looks to be in good shape! I'll check back regularly to see how progress is going! WikiRedactor (talk) 17:52, 13 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thanks a bunch for review WikiRedactor. I believe I have now taken care of everything. If there is anything outstanding still, let me know. STATic message me! 03:37, 14 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
My pleasure! I have no additional issues to raise, so I am happy to pass the article, good work! WikiRedactor (talk) 19:39, 14 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.