Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a292fe357f4dcdd8

Jump to content

Talk:Indian Packing Company/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by History6042 in topic GA review

GA review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Gonzo fan2007 (talk · contribs) 21:17, 17 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: History6042 (talk · contribs) 23:49, 26 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I will do this one. History6042😊 (Contact me) 23:49, 26 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Comments

[edit]

I will start with a source spotcheck. I will check 5. History6042😊 (Contact me) 23:50, 26 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

3 says what it needs to, same with 5, 7, 9, and 12. History6042😊 (Contact me) 23:53, 26 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
Images are relevant and are both Public Domain. History6042😊 (Contact me) 23:54, 26 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
There is no edit warring, the article is focused and it doesn't have too much detail. History6042😊 (Contact me) 23:57, 26 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
Article is neutral, it only had one issue I found but I fixed it. History6042😊 (Contact me) 00:00, 27 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
No, major issues with prose or MOS. Pass. History6042😊 (Contact me) 11:43, 28 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Progress

[edit]
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.