Talk:IndiGo

Disruption

Pinging @3Daxial2424 - per WP:CIRCULAR, Wikipedia itself isn't a reliable source. So that paragraph still requires sourcing, which right now it isn't. Also courtesy pinging @Johnj1995. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 10:54, 12 December 2025 (UTC)

Thanks Danner. I previously added a citation for the paragraph but someone suggested me to link to the main article. I article about the disruption has further links to support the information. 3Daxial2424 (talk) 10:59, 12 December 2025 (UTC)

Really both are ideal. What I would personally do, is have a sub-heading in the Incidents section about this event, and summarise in a couple of sentences what happened, with citations. Then place a "Main" hatnote in the section with the link to the main article. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 11:01, 12 December 2025 (UTC)

Sure, I will do that soon 3Daxial2424 (talk) 11:03, 12 December 2025 (UTC)

While you are working on that, I will add the article to the see also section. Feel free to remove it after you, or anyone else, adds that. Arnav Bhate (talk • contribs) 11:29, 12 December 2025 (UTC)

To be honest I'm surprised that 2025 IndiGo disruption is even a standalone article. I'm proposing its merger to here. 10mmsocket (talk) 11:08, 12 December 2025 (UTC)

I kind of think it does merit a standalone article, as described below. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 11:15, 12 December 2025 (UTC)

Proposed merge of 2025 IndiGo disruption into IndiGo

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Consensus seems to be to keep it separate and let it survive or be deleted on its own merit --10mmsocket (talk) 15:53, 12 December 2025 (UTC)

---

This is just a bit of history of IndiGo. There's no need at all for it to be a standalone article 10mmsocket (talk) 11:10, 12 December 2025 (UTC)

• Oppose - I feel as though it's significant enough to merit its own article, as it's a well-covered event in the airline's history. The article is well written and well sourced, and just needs a "main" hatnote in IndiGo. There's precedent for such articles existing too, such as 2022 Southwest Airlines scheduling crisis - indeed the IndiGo crisis resulted in a larger number of cancellations than SouthWest's meltdown. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 11:14, 12 December 2025 (UTC)
• Oppose: The article is well sourced, and the incident is significant enough for its own article, considering the news coverage. Merging it here while giving it its due weight would result in a very large section just devoted to the disruption. Arnav Bhate (talk • contribs) 11:25, 12 December 2025 (UTC)
• Oppose The stand-alone article will end up deleted for failing WP:NOTABILITY and per WP:NOTNEWS.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 13:26, 12 December 2025 (UTC)

  I think letting it fall on its own (lack of) merit is a good point. 10mmsocket (talk) 15:50, 12 December 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Spelling error in the "Services" section.

In the "Services" section, the sentence which describes IndiGo Stretch, has the word "flight" spelled as "fligts". Please make the appropriate corrections. ~2025-42880-93 (talk) 08:53, 25 December 2025 (UTC)

 Done please use {{Edit semi-protected}} next time Arnav Bhate (talk • contribs) 04:19, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

Anthem

Hi @Jetstreamer, can you please guide me on why the addition of info on the anthem is "unencyclopaedic"? It was well sourced and I did my best to stick to WP:NPOV. Thanks. SerChevalerie (talk) 18:12, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

I think WP:NOTNEWS applies. An article about an airline should focus on its operations and services. You may want to take a look at WP:NOT as well.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 13:05, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

Thanks. Keeping WP:DUE in mind, I am adding some of this back in the "Services" section. SerChevalerie (talk) 19:59, 7 April 2026 (UTC)