Talk:Incomplete Nature

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook

Philosophy: Literature / Mind / Contemporary Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophical literature
	Philosophy of mind
	Contemporary philosophy

Scope

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This article is more about the ideas in the book than the book itself. This article should be reduce to cover only the book. If the notions in the book are notable, then they should move to their own article and given sensible sources (rather than just the primary source -- the book itself). -- Mikeblas (talk) 15:02, 13 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

What would the title of such an article be? {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 212.95.237.92 (talk) 19:17, 14 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

A page that knows where it met you.

Talk:Incomplete Nature

Scope