Talk:Incineration
Add topicLatest comment: 5 months ago by Artoria2e5 in topic Debate section
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Incineration article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 6 months  |
 | This  level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit]
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 8 September 2020 and 15 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Amcintyr.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:23, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Debate section
[edit]The debate section is a classical WP:PROCON with the classic problem of fragmentation of facts. Ideally we instead have an organization of:
Debate:
- Emissions
- Overall health
- Particulates including PM 2.5
- Ash
- Degree of hazard
- In landfills -- how much care is requried?
- Flue gas heavy metals -- how much is really emitted?
- Other externalties
- Power
- Traffic, visual pollution, jobs, other local community problems.
- Alternatives
- Interaction with recycling/reuse/reduce
- Alternative technologies for destruction of trash
If we presented arguments and studies in each of these sections it would be less prone to getting outdated. But of course that won't happen because nobody bothers to :) Artoria2e5 🌉 12:02, 14 April 2026 (UTC)