Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a251fbea4af0de81

Jump to content

Talk:Impedance threshold device

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Numbersinstitute in topic Needs more description Suggestion

Medical guidelines

[edit]

Please see WP:MEDMOS and WP:MEDRS for how to organize and source medical articles. This Dispatch is helpful in locating the correct kinds of sources (secondary reviews): Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2008-06-30/Dispatches.

This template filler is helpful in generating citations from a PMID. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 17:04, 28 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Needs more description Suggestion

[edit]

Most of the article discusses its effectiveness.

The article also needs to say what it is in more detail: Article says it is a valve which "opens". Valves can do many things. Does it stop airflow or reduce it? Is the valve engineered to control the rate of airflow (liters per second) or total volume (liters) of each breath? Does it control air inflow or outflow or both? My guess is that it reduces the maximum rate of inflow, so this reduces oxygen in the lungs (bad) but increases venous blood flow to he heart (good), and effectiveness depends on the good outweighing the bad. I hope that an editor who knows more would be willing to say if it stops? reduces? rate? volume? of inflow? or outflow? and what effects that has on lungs and heart.

Article would also benefit from more coverage of the business side: date of invention, number of suppliers, cost? extent of use? presumably disposable? Numbersinstitute (talk) 15:03, 21 January 2019 (UTC)Reply