Talk:Impalement/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Rschen7754 (talk · contribs) 10:01, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Unfortunately I will need to quick-fail this: the main issue is that there are large portions of the article that are not cited. --Rschen7754 10:01, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

• I will note that this article is well on the way to getting to GA, it's just still got quite a bit of referencing related work needed. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 10:03, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

What is NOT cited/supported by material provided in the text? Be specific!Arildnordby (talk) 10:08, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Please read WP:V - every assertion needs to be cited. There are entire paragraphs that are not cited. --Rschen7754 10:10, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Lead text and Methods section summarize, and do not assert anything beyond what is provided by and based upon numerous citations below. This goes on elements like a)Usage of stake/pole, b) Usage of hooks, c) Longitudinal impalement, d) frontal-dorsal impalement, e) Rectal insertion, f) Vaginal insertion, g) Exit wound in neck/shoulder area etc. All of these have cited, backed-up examples in the text. So I can agree to needed citation clarification for those sections, but certainly not that any of the assertions within those sections are unsupported. They are not.Arildnordby (talk) 10:18, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

I have clarified citations as requested, and have therefore chosen to renominate the article for GA status.Arildnordby (talk) 14:39, 30 January 2013 (UTC)