Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2481b125aa23a24

Jump to content

Talk:Immunostaining

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 17 years ago by 67.82.231.205 in topic Your rewrite

Merge/split Proposals &c

[edit]

For those who don't know, there's some discussion about how to develop the articles specific to individual immuno methods. If you're interested, join in here. (No need to respond on this page) — eitch 16:55, 18 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

I've

[edit]

I've re-written the page from the bottom up. I think it is best mainly left as a set of links to already comprehensive articles on specific immunostaining methods. I'd be tempted to grade it a B, but I'll let other people take a look at what I've done. Dr Aaron 12:34, 26 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Not a lot of comments, but I'll make it a B anyway. Dr Aaron 13:28, 2 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Your rewrite

[edit]

Hello, Dr Aaron. Thanks for all of teh work that you've put into the article, but I'm not sure that reducing it to its barest of bones is the best approach. I think that I understand what you were trying to do, but it seems to me that an encyclopedia is supposed to fully explain a subject, especially one as important as immunostaining. What do all of the various immunological techniques have in common? Why do people use them? What are their limits? ClockworkSoul 06:08, 27 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

While I appreciate the reasons for your reversion, I still think my re-write was more accurate and provided easy access to highly comprehensive immunostaining pages (many of which I contributed to). One of the wastes I see with Wikipedia is that there is so much redundancy in what is written - people duplicate information where a link would suffice. Still, I agree that I could have put more information about the commonalities and differences between the methods, their limitations and, most importantly their uses.
The current page is a woeful effort. When I get a chance, I plan to revert the page to my original effort, but expand and elaborate on this. Dr Aaron 23:15, 27 September 2006 (UTC)Reply
OK, I had another go, but I have left the links to the main pages in. It is also referenced now. Dr Aaron 05:56, 28 September 2006 (UTC)Reply


"via dry, semi-dry, or wet blotting methods," what are these methods. I've looked all over the internet and can't get a definitive answer. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.108.203.96 (talk) 05:44, 10 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

dry, semi-dry, and wet blotting just refers to the different apparatuses used for blotting. The end result is essentiall the same between the three. -AkD —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.82.231.205 (talk) 02:53, 11 August 2008 (UTC)Reply