Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Endangered languages, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Endangered languagesWikipedia:WikiProject Endangered languagesTemplate:WikiProject Endangered languagesEndangered languages
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I might note that all traits listed common with Uzbek/Qarluq are retentions, while the traits listed common with Kipchak are innovations. This suggests a rather different conclusion to me: Ili Turki is a Kipchak language, perhaps one that split very early from the rest of Kipchak so that it retained the traits which it now has in common with Qarluq; contact with Qarluq may have reinforced the retention of those traits such as geminates. (Alternatively, it could have acquired the Kipchak traits via contact, but that would have to be relatively recent contact with Kazakh – which is indeed spoken in the region, the Ili Kazakh Autonomous Prefecture, in modern times – because the Eastern Kipchak language was spoken in northern Kazakhstan originally.) However, it would be important to know which other traits relative to typical Qarluq and Kipchak traits Ili Turki exhibits. Perhaps the present sample is just highly unfortunate and misleading. --Florian Blaschke (talk) 15:58, 2 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
