Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a247c41e89f7ddf0

Jump to content

Talk:Idiospermum

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 2 years ago by 2001:56A:F0E9:9B00:90D:E4E5:EBE:96A5 in topic Well Done

Why "Idiot Fruit"

[edit]

It would be nice to have an explanation of the origin of this name. 14.200.248.63 (talk) 04:53, 15 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Yes, a glaring hole in the article. Jidanni (talk) 18:16, 9 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
A glaring hole indeed! A brief explanation has been added to the article under the heading "Etymology".Junglenut (talk) 05:58, 10 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Additional Info

[edit]

The tree was first discovered in 1902 by German botanist Ludwig Diels who documented and collected its flower and took it back to the Berlin Herbarium. But that specimen was destroyed in a fire in 1943 caused by a bombing raid by the Allies.

For several years botanists failed to recognise the tree’s uniqueness, arguing that Diels’ discovery was merely a garden plant that had somehow made its way into Queensland’s wet tropics. https://www.australiangeographic.com.au/topics/science-environment/2017/07/the-idiot-fruit-tree/ 14.200.248.63 (talk) 04:58, 15 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

My recent edits

[edit]

For anyone following this article, I think I am done with my improvements and expansions - for now 😉 I believe it is a much more coherent work than it was a week ago. I'd still welcome any suggestions for more improvements though.  Junglenut |Talk  10:03, 10 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Well Done

[edit]

I'd just like to voice my hearty approval for the manner in which this article is presented, with the botanical jargon coupled to decodings for the lay reader; I wish all wiki articles were structured this way, to be a welcoming learning tool rather than a wall to intimidate the uninitiated (I'm particularly looking at you, wiki math article writers). 2001:56A:F0E9:9B00:90D:E4E5:EBE:96A5 (talk) 20:57, 15 July 2024 (UTC)JustSomeWikiReaderReply