Talk:Ice Peak

This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Ice Peak has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: October 3, 2025. (Reviewed version).

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Volcanoes: Canada Low‑importance

	Volcanoes portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolcanoesWikipedia:WikiProject VolcanoesTemplate:WikiProject VolcanoesWikiProject Volcanoes
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Volcanism of Canada task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Mountains Low‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada: British Columbia / Geography / The 10,000 Challenge Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject British Columbia.

This article is supported by WikiProject Geography of Canada.

Canada
10,000

This article was created or improved as part of The Canada 10,000 Challenge - You can help!

Geography Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Geography To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests: See Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places and Missing articles about Locations
Assess: Tag related article talk pages with {{WikiProject Geography}}. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: Unassessed geography articles and Unknown-importance geography articles.
Cleanup: See Geography articles needing attention
Deletion sorting: Listed at Geographic related deletion discussions
Geographical coordinates: See Articles missing geocoordinate data by country
Infobox: See Geography articles needing infoboxes
Map: See Wikipedia requested maps
Notability: See Geography articles with topics of unclear notability
Photo: See Wikipedia requested photographs of places
Stubs: See Geography stubs

GA review

Latest comment: 1 year ago10 comments2 people in discussion

Passed. SnowyRiver28 (talk) 22:49, 3 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Ice Peak/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Volcanoguy (talk · contribs) 20:24, 1 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: SnowyRiver28 (talk · contribs) 12:37, 1 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Review

Nominator has sufficient authorship
No copyvio detected
Images are valid and suitable
Source spot check completed and passed on multiple claims checked

Lead

Just a note here, I'm not sure a casual reader would know what a cirque is. Do you think a short explanation is warranted? This isn't a requirement, just something to consider as you're obviously much more experienced with geological article conventions than me.

Geography and germorphology

...one of the largest provincial parks in British Columbia and was established in 1972 to showcase the volcanic landscape. This may be because of the source, but is "showcase" the right word here? Should it say "protect" or something else? Again, not a requirement, just up for discussion.
"Protect" is definitely a better word, but the source uses "showcase", which from my understanding isn't the same as "protect". Volcanoguy 22:11, 3 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

If it's from the source that's ok then SnowyRiver28 (talk) 22:36, 3 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
...Mount Edziza area but also the Spectrum Range to the south, which are separated by Raspberry Pass. should it be "Spectrum Ranges... which are" or "Spectrum Range.. which is".
No, it's never called the "Spectrum Ranges". What if "both of" is included between "south" and "which"? Volcanoguy 22:11, 3 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Sounds good to me! SnowyRiver28 (talk) 22:36, 3 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
Done. Volcanoguy 22:46, 3 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Geology

No issues here

Name and etymology

No issues here

Comments

Starting review. SnowyRiver28 (talk) 12:37, 1 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Volcanoguy: Great work! I found this article super interesting and engaging to read. I've made a couple of minor notes above, but other than those it's pretty much good to go. Please let me know if you have any questions or comments.SnowyRiver28 (talk) 04:07, 3 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This page was redesigned at the edge.

A page that knows where it met you.