Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2491a9e5c30d434

Jump to content

Talk:iPod Nano

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 month ago by Day Creature in topic Semi-protected edit request on 22 June 2026

Product Safety Scandal Category

[edit]

I suggest that the Product Safety Scandal category be removed. Yes I've heard of Foxconn and I know there may be issues there. --MarsInSVG (talk) 15:07, 19 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

I fail to see what you having "heard of Foxconn" has to do with whether or not this article discusses a product safety scandal. A "product safety scandal" means there was a widespread dangerous defect with the product. Which according to this article, there was, and Apple issued a massive recall. Since this article discusses that, it seems appropriate that this article be in that category. Why do you suggest otherwise? --173.252.44.52 (talk) 06:10, 6 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Screen durability and battery swelling issues

[edit]

Hi, all. I have split IPod Nano#Reception into two smaller sections, for better readability. Individual paragraphs now follow major timeline events (initial reception, screen durability problems reported, Apple acknowledges publicly).

The section on battery swelling potentially causing the screen to discolor or break is still problematic. I have tagged it as WP:OR for now, with citations requested. I'm sure that the swelling issue _has_ happened, for somebody, probably in early production runs, but there are no sources cited here except an iFixit.com repair guide for replacing the battery.

Because of the amount of time that has passed, and because there are no specific generation(s) mentioned as being affected, my (totally fallible) instinct would be just to remove that whole section. Please chime in if there are reasons why that would be a bad idea. --Ernstkm (talk) 14:45, 8 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

2nd Gen last paragraph

[edit]

There's a mistake. I think where it says about Apple donating$10 for each red ipod sold to the ProjectRed Initiative. It should be, Product Red https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Product_Red If that's the same thing. Seems to be anyway. Hardly matters i guess but I'm sure the Product Red people might appreciate the link to.. seems to be for a positive cause anyway.. 24.19.141.129 (talk) 10:52, 2 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

That's what it already says; and it's already linked. Best, DFlhb (talk) 02:43, 3 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

"IFat" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

The redirect IFat has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 November 2 § IFat until a consensus is reached. Duckmather (talk) 17:57, 2 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 22 June 2026

[edit]

It is incorrect to claim that all (PRODUCT) RED finishes for iPod Nano generations 2-7 were only available through the online Apple Store. There is no credible evidence to claim that such is fact. A press release from 2006 announces the (PRODUCT) RED special edition finish for the recently-released Nano 2nd generation: https://www.apple.com/ie/newsroom/2006/10/13Apple-Announces-iPod-nano-PRODUCT-RED-Special-Edition/. The article claims the following about purchasing availability of the finish: "The iPod nano (PRODUCT) RED Special Edition is available worldwide in a 4GB model for £129 (inc VAT) through the Apple Store." The "Apple Store" does not necessarily imply only the online store. I was able to find evidence that for the iPod Nano 2nd generation, the PRODUCT(RED) finish was available exclusively through Apple's online New Zealand store: https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2006/12/06Apple-Launches-iTunes-Online-Apple-Stores-in-New-Zealand/. The article states: "The iPod nano (PRODUCT) RED Special Edition is available today in a 4GB model for NZ$349 including GST and an 8GB model for NZ$449 including GST through the online Apple Store (www.apple.co.nz)". Yet, even this does not necessarily imply that this exclusivity will remain the case forever after the date the article was published.

Change the footnote "Exclusively available on the online Apple store" to be more nuanced; such is only maybe the case for the 2nd gen Nano in (PRODUCT) RED. Remove the footnote from all other (PRODUCT) RED finishes on all other models. ~2026-33554-28 (talk) 23:50, 22 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

 Not done: the page's protection level has changed since this request was placed. You should now be able to edit the page yourself. If you still seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. Day Creature (talk) 03:13, 23 June 2026 (UTC)Reply