Talk:IP over Avian Carriers

Missing the implementation of RFC6214

A group of people successfully implemented RFC6124 and documented the results on YouTube, however the entire video is in like French or something so I can’t understand a word of it, which is why I didn’t just edit the main page including a summary of events. The video footage however was pretty clear in showing the pigeons and scanning of datagrams with laptops in the field. Perhaps this can be included in the “real life implementations” section as it is quite notably the second ever implementation of IPoAC, while also quite notable being the first to use the newer IPv6 standard for RFC1149?

The channel is “Radek Vostrez” — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:4040:A4D6:9600:F59E:C076:C844:50C2 (talk) 07:21, 10 August 2025 (UTC)

Miscategorised?

If IPoAC has been successfully implemented as per the "Real-life implementation" section of the article then surely it is no longer a "Fictional telecom protocol" and thus should not be in that category. Am I wrong? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.244.214.104 (talk) 15:46, November 13, 2014 (UTC)

Front page image

We should change the generic pigeon photo on the front page to one of the photos of the pigeons actually used in the 2001 Bergen rfc implementation: https://web.archive.org/web/20130531075408/http://www.blug.linux.no/rfc1149/vegard_bilder/index.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.209.234.141 (talk) 12:38, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

Those might be helpful in the body but I don't see the sort of iconic photo that works for the lead. Also it is unclear what the copyright status of these images it. ~Kvng (talk) 14:04, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

Recipes?

Long after designing <https://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3/humor/RFC1149.html>, it occured to me that there is more than one way of cooking a carrier. If there is an RFC or RFC series on conditioning the medium, that would be a useful addition to the article. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Username:Chatul (talk) 17:07, 3 April 2026 (UTC)