Talk:iMac G4

Cite error

28. Kahney (2013), p. 188. Cite error: The named reference "FOOTNOTEKahney2013188" was defined multiple times with different content. Graham Beards (talk) 15:44, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

Not entirely sure what the issue was, but I fixed it with a tweak to the number. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ^talk 16:36, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

I couldn't see what was causing the error, I had a good look. Graham Beards (talk) 17:04, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

• Apple iMac 4G (32871160027).jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:51, 16 May 2025 (UTC)

The picture is bad looking as its blurred

Can some one make a new photo 50.209.62.201 (talk) 15:46, 16 May 2025 (UTC)

The iMac g3 and g5 pictures are the picture of compputer off so make sure the iMac g4 is off 50.209.62.201 (talk) 15:47, 16 May 2025 (UTC)

change to this photo https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:IMac_G4_17_inch.jpg 50.209.62.201 (talk) 15:50, 16 May 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 16 May 2025

Change the main image of iMac g4 to this image https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:IMac_G4_17_inch.jpg 50.209.62.201 (talk) 17:29, 16 May 2025 (UTC)

 Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{Edit semi-protected}} template. Valorrr ^{(lets chat)} 18:41, 16 May 2025 (UTC)

Discuss image

User:Jhoncena1234 and User:David Fuchs, you've been rvting each other over the main image. Please reach a consensus here. As it stands I'd like to point out that in the current version the image has no speakers, and that the caption needs to be accurate if it is to have the screen-off image.

Option 1: File:IMac_G4_17_inch.jpg Option 2: File:Apple iMac 4G (32871160027).jpg Bremps... 01:58, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

The previous image, which was part of the FAC review, is a superior shot in every way. If somehow the blurred screen is distracting, it could be replaced with a black screen, but that's still better than duplicating an image already in the article. It's also just an inferior image in terms of showing the floating monitor design (the arm isn't even visible in the current shot.) Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ^talk 19:01, 22 May 2025 (UTC)