Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the IMAX Melbourne article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
This article is written in Australian English, which has its own spelling conventions (centre, colour, realise, program, travelled) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
IMAX Melbourne is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture
A fact from IMAX Melbourne appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 26 December2024(check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Latest comment: 1 year ago13 comments5 people in discussion
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Two new sources ( and ) have been added to the article to back up the hook. I hope this suffices. Please let me know if there is anything else that needs to be done.—Mjks28 (talk) 02:49, 12 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
How does one quantify if the given sources are reliable enough to support an exceptional claim? Is there a minimum amount of sources needed, and are there only certain types of publications allowed?—Mjks28 (talk) 03:11, 15 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
Ideally an industry standard would work, but I think between MIFF and Beat we should have enough. The main reason I flagged this originally was the use of a primary source, which is definitely a no-no.—Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:12, 15 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=logo}
- Article was nominated 9 days after being moved to mainspace. The limit is 7 days.
Cambalachero (talk) 18:39, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
Pulled from Prep 3. The hook fact is cited to promotional material from the theatre, which is insufficient for such an exceptional claim. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:11, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
I think so as well. Unless there are any further objections, let's roll.--Launchballer 17:56, 15 December 2024 (UTC)