Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a251aa6cbd565645

Jump to content

Talk:IBM Remote Supervisor Adapter

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Minstrel1977 in topic Removed patent claim

Definantly there are some changes needed here. It is outdated and does not reflect unbiased information. I will contribute, but let it be known that I work for IBM. However, I work for IBM on the customer side and am familiar with the limitations and criticism directed against the RSA II. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ctustison (talkcontribs) 11:05, 11 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Removed the rants. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ctustison (talkcontribs) 11:13, 11 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

If you work for IBM, you should be trying to fix the issues identified on this page rather than trying to introduce corporate bias into Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by AshtonBenson (talkcontribs) 21:11, 30 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Can you please add some cloesup images of the plugs of the internal RSAII connector cable 73P9312? (Both ends and front and back of the plug that goes into the motherboard). For fixing broken connector-cables by comparing cable-colors with the layout of your original cable... Or maybe even write down the complete pin-layout of both connectors? Thanx --Votanxerxes (talk) 16:19, 14 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Removed patent claim

[edit]

Removed the claim of the technology being based on a specific patent as it was based on the author´s interpretation of a primary source alone, as per WP:NOTRS: "All interpretive claims, analyses, or synthetic claims about primary sources must be referenced to a secondary source, rather than original analysis of the primary-source material by Wikipedia editors."

Minstrel1977 (talk) 18:18, 1 April 2016 (UTC)Reply