Talk:I.M

Requested move 14 June 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. For reasons of concision, and supporters pointed out how WP:SMALLDETAILS makes the undisambiguated name acceptable. But I will ask at Technical Requests for a history merge, since the redirect we need to move this page on top of in fact contains an early version of the article. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 04:47, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

---

I.M (rapper) → I.M – I.M redirects to I.M (rapper) so the article title should not have the subtitle have (rapper) Tai123.123 (talk) 04:05, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

This is a contested technical request (permalink). GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 18:58, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

• Oppose, and retarget I.M to dabpage IM; insufficient disambiguation. 162 etc. (talk) 18:28, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
• Support per WP:SMALLDETAILS. cookie monster 755 00:21, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
• Support Similar to .im, this is a case of WP:SMALLDETAILS being valid. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 15:49, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Orphaned references in I.M

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of I.M's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "no mercy":

• From Monsta X: Park, Gyu-oh (November 13, 2014). "New idol group to be born through Mnet's 'No.Mercy'". K-pop Herald. Archived from the original on November 12, 2020. Retrieved September 5, 2020.
• From Joohoney: Park, Gyu-oh (November 13, 2014). "New idol group to be born through Mnet's 'No.Mercy'". K-pop Herald. Retrieved July 11, 2017.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 01:10, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

Infobox image

@Phraowin, I think File:Monsta X I.M Chanel April 2024.jpg works a bit better as an infobox image as it's better lit and showcases the subject's face. Meanwhile, File:I.M at Diesel in July 2024.jpg fits better in the body due to its subject matter and aspect ratio/zoom. Wracking ^talk! 02:01, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Puffery and promotional language

@Phraowin, please do not remove the {{peacock}} template until all issues have been resolved. The issue is with the entire section. The content and tone are unencyclopedic and have weak sourcing. Wracking ^talk! 02:32, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi! I removed it since it was resolved already. I find the refs given reliable, while the second and third paragraphs are okay. Have a good day! Phraowin (talk) 02:36, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

It was not resolved. The section still name-drops artists with no relation to the subject, and overall uses promotional tone. Language like I.M dominates domestic and international charts with his solo releases, drawing hot global response is blatant puffery. Please note that this is not the only example of the issue, hence the tag for the entire section. Wracking ^talk! 02:39, 10 March 2026 (UTC)