Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a21f2d9adeb92877

Jump to content

Talk:Hyperdiffusionism

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Dougweller in topic "all logical and great things"

"all logical and great things"

[edit]

"Hyperdiffusionism is a hypothesis stating that one civilization or people is the creator of all logical and great things which are then diffused to less civilized nations."? Not a good start to an article in my opinion. What is 'logical' about a pyramid? I think we need to find a better definition. AndyTheGrump (talk) 16:18, 21 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Here are another way the concept is described, I agree our current wording is quite lacking. Im not claiming this link as a source, just as ideas on how to phrase the intro

  • "Hyperdiffusionism is the idea that when different cultures share particular elements, one culture must have adapted it from the other"

Maybe something like "Hyperdiffusionism is a hypothesis which argues that similarities between distant cultures in areas such as art, architecture, religious elements, implies a common ancestor civilization that disseminated the roots of the divergent cultures."

Here is a good academic source giving some background, but unfortunately does not provide a nice concise definition for us to clone Gaijin42 (talk) 16:44, 21 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

(edit conflict)Something like that. See , , , , and an article by the guy who coined the term and we don't mention:.(see also). There are more. And a search on GBooks on the word shows a lot of sources to use to add it to articles. Dougweller (talk) 16:59, 21 January 2015 (UTC)Reply