Talk:Hydroxyethyl starch
Add topic | The content of Hydroxyethyl starch-induced pruritus was merged into Hydroxyethyl starch on 2025-05-16. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Hydroxyethyl starch.
|
Proposed merge with pentastarch
[edit]- Oppose. Pentastarch is a subset of hydroxyethyl starch. It is worthy of its own page. Nephron T|C 05:19, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
Hydroxyethyl redirects to ethanol. Should it not redirect to Hydroxyethyl starch? Greswik (talk) 13:05, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
Neutrality of reference unclear
[edit]^ Zander R, Boldt J, Engelmann L, Mertzlufft F, Sirtl C, Stuttmann R (January 2007). "[The design of the VISEP trial. Critical appraisal"] (in German). Anaesthesist 56 (1): 71–7. doi:10.1007/s00101-006-1122-4. PMID 17192828. http://www.springerlink.com/content/q3053v24116050k2/.
This reference has two problems for English Wikipedia. First it is in German. Secondarily and more potentially important it appears to self refer to work by one of its authors, Boldt J who has had one paper retracted on HES due to both ethical problems and inability to relate the raw data to that actually published and many others retracted due to ethical problems. Cheers 91.84.69.219 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 01:23, 12 March 2011 (UTC). This reference should be deleted.As already Said ist references non Peer reviewed Data.One Author Joachim Boldt has been Fired from his Hospital due to fraud. 88 of his Papers have been retracted as no ethics Approval.Furthermore,the Autors of visep hav Published a Debütalbum to this,also in German,which is Not Cited. Brunkhorst !Anästhesist 2008. Also the follow up studies like 6s ,Chest prove,that the Arguments in this Article are invalid — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.226.91.201 (talk) 20:49, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hydroxyethyl starch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130701042138/http://www.mhra.gov.uk/NewsCentre/Pressreleases/CON287028 to http://www.mhra.gov.uk/NewsCentre/Pressreleases/CON287028
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:09, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Safety info comparison
[edit]Maybe interesting for incorporating safety info into the article: Wiedermann, Christian J, and Klaus Eisendle. "Comparison of Hydroxyethyl Starch Regulatory Summaries From the Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency." Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice 10, no. 1 (2017): doi:10.1186/s40545-016-0090-6 (For instance, should liver also be mentioned?) Jodi.a.schneider (talk) 19:01, 30 July 2017 (UTC) Hi all, there are some new developments The regulators PRAC of EMA want to ban HES in the EU. This is quite importanthttp://www.ema.europa.eu/ema/index.jsp?curl=pages/news_and_events/news/2018/01/news_detail_002882.jsp&mid=WC0b01ac058004d5c1. see link. however I was not able to place it in the article, excuse my ignorance — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:DE:2BDE:D869:79C0:F769:C883:8E86 (talk) 13:21, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Merge from Hydroxyethyl starch-induced pruritus
[edit]Since that stub only had basically one line of information, I boldly merged most of the sources into a new section in this article and expanded upon the one line. I don't believe that there is anywhere near enough information on the side effect to merit its own page, even though it is likely notable independently. Furthermore, I think the information about it, such as the cumulative dose being important, is best in the context that the rest of the information on this page provides, per WP:NOPAGE.
I believe I got all the merge steps done right, if I missed anything or messed something up apologies in advance - I don't frequently do merges but User:WhatamIdoing suggested (correctly) that at least some of the references from that page could be used to expand this one, so I attempted to do so. -bɜ:ʳkənhɪmez | me | talk to me! 16:54, 16 May 2025 (UTC)