Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a24bb9196998b7b5

Jump to content

Talk:Hush kit

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 16 years ago by Prosfilaes in topic Silence

Cons?

[edit]

Has a hush kit any disadvantages? Weight? Higher fuel consumption? Anything else? --79.194.192.184 (talk) 20:20, 2 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Silence

[edit]

"It should also be made clear that, while reducing noise pollution considerably, no hush kit can silence an aircraft engine."

I removed this sentence from the article. What does it mean? Surely nothing can silence an aircraft engine or an airplane short of flying it inside in a sound-proof building; it flies through the air creating massive air vibrations, for crying out loud. It would be much better to have a comparison between engines without hush kits (including modern ones that don't need them) and engines with hush kits in the article. (It's also unencyclopedic; "it should be made clear" shouldn't appear in Wikipedia outside a quote.)--Prosfilaes (talk) 14:35, 10 April 2010 (UTC)Reply