Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a225865f1a0aaddf

Jump to content

Talk:Humor Risk

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Immigrant laborer in topic Shouldn't this be in past tense because it's a lost film?

Another lost film?

[edit]

In the article it says: "Humor Risk is sometimes confused with another Marx Brothers film project from 1926 which also never reached the screen." What is the title (or topic) of that other film. I don't think I've ever heard of another such film from that year. — Cinemaniac (talk) 04:37, 21 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

I've tried to clear that up. As far as Harpo and Groucho were aware, there was only one Humorisk and not two. Also spelled Humorisk, not Humor Risk. I'll need to check tonight to confirm I've not totally screwed that up, but according to various books that is the case. Not sure why there's confusion lies on the Marxology page though - doesn't seem to tie in with facts from the Brothers themselves. Drivenapart (talk) 14:01, 21 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

New article = Richard Smith (Silent film director)

[edit]

New article, created, at Richard Smith (Silent film director). Additional assistance in research would be appreciated, feel free to help out at the article's talk page. Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 16:34, 11 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Shouldn't this be in past tense because it's a lost film?

[edit]

- Immigrant laborer (talk) 20:05, 10 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

No - Immigrant laborer (talk) 20:05, 10 September 2018 (UTC)Reply