Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a24e41d1fafd36cd

Jump to content

Talk:Human feces

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Unprotect the Page

[edit]

Tell the Wikitruth! Unprotect the page and put the turd at the top!  Preceding unsigned comment added by MichaelScottFed (talkcontribs) 21:07, 21 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

YESSSSSSSS  Preceding unsigned comment added by ~2026-56291 (talk) 10:14, 5 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Colour and size

[edit]

Isn't human feces larger and darker than the feces shown on the picture?

Yes, we need a better picture for sure. --TheGwinnettian (talk) 03:39, 18 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
Yes, it should darker from proper bile metabolism by the bacterias. It should be larger and diameter and quite less long. Producing that much wastes mean a lot of things are unabsorbed. I suspect a diet high in refined carbohydrates and deficient in proper fats. There is probably some inflammation too, given the small diameter of the stool.

Main image is unrepresentative, should be replaced

[edit]

Okay, this has bugged me for a while. Obviously there's been lots of controversy over the main image for this article being objectionable or just plain gross, and obviously all of that is covered by WP:NOTCENSORED. However, I have a different issue with the image: no one's poop looks like this!

Why is it so orange? Why does it have so many black specks in it? It looks… unhealthy.

Are there any other usable images that could more properly represent the average human's stool? If not, I or someone else should seriously consider trying to donate a new replacement stool sample. Ithinkiplaygames (talk) 02:16, 15 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Human feces can in fact look like this and be healthy. It may be the lighting or the contents however I am not particulariliy inclined to go back and further analyze the photo myself. According to the bristol stool chart, the stool featured is healthy looking. As for colour, any shades of brown as long as they are not red, black, yellow or some other colour indicating a pathological process, are normal. IntentionallyDense (Contribs) 09:32, 15 February 2025 (UTC)Reply
I believe the defecator in question may have eaten some corn and beans. The black specks are likely bean skins and the yellow specks are likely the hulls of corn kernels. While the feces seem healthy in this instance, I would advocate for a smoother and more representative portrayal of human feces in order to avoid confusion. TheGwinnettian (talk) 07:20, 17 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
okay I will bite the bullet and look for another photo sigh IntentionallyDense (Contribs) 17:34, 17 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
The only alternatives seem to be feces seem to be photos of toilets, I do think this is probably the best photo we currently have. IntentionallyDense (Contribs) 17:39, 17 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
I nominate this one TheGwinnettian (talk) 19:51, 17 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
That one would be good but for the shadow, which ruins it, IMO. I do agree with Ithinkiplaygames that the current image is less than ideal. File:5038728052037 L.jpg would be perfect, except for the crappy resolution (sorry, couldn't resist).--Mojo Hand (talk) 00:31, 18 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Mojo Hand That one might be a bit too short and light colored ~2025-41503-44 (talk) 03:25, 18 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
This thread needs a hero TheGwinnettian (talk) 03:35, 18 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
I really don't see the need to change the current photo. It is probably the least shocking/vulgar of the images suggested which makes it a good candidate. I also do not feel the need to go looking for better photos but it seems that others are much more motivated than me to fulfill that role regardless. IntentionallyDense (Contribs) 04:46, 18 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
@IntentionallyDense I guess I'll search for another one now that my account is auto-approved TheGwinnettian (talk) 20:27, 22 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
should I try to change the picture if I find a picture? WJBU123 (talk) 03:15, 3 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 5 January 2026

[edit]

SpELling needs to be fixed ~2026-56291 (talk) 17:13, 5 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

When requesting an edit, you should specify what change should be made PeriodicEditor (talk) 17:18, 5 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want made. Please detail the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. --pro-anti-air ––>(talk)<–– 18:52, 5 January 2026 (UTC)Reply