Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22e36cb5e06f25b

Jump to content

Talk:Human-centered design

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 month ago by Gnomingstuff in topic AI

Merge with User-centered_design

[edit]

"Human-centred design" and "User-centred design" are basically synonyms. There's no need for two articles. Searches for "Human-centred design" should just redirect to "user-centered design". Paul Ralph (University of Auckland) (talk) 16:53, 30 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Oppose. There is definitely a difference between the two. "Human-centered design" is specifically used to be more broad than simple user-centered design. This is, for example, mentioned by David Benyon in Designing Interactive Systems. Prinsgezinde (talk) 23:47, 19 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Don Norman 18:57, 5 April 2021 (UTC) As one of the initial inventors of the phrases (and the methods used by them) of both human-centered and user-centered design (I used the term "user-centered system design" as the title of a book in 1986) they are identical: I simply disliked calling people "users." No change in intention was intended. The notion that one is more broad than the other is simply wrong. I don't know who David Benyon is, but he is misguided. The two articles should be combined. This current article on HCD is annoyingly self-centered. And the critiques of HCD were clearly written by someone who does not understand the broadened uses to which HCD methods have been applied, including to every single one of the areas that the critique says it cannot be used. A disgraceful situation.

References: Norman, D., & Draper, S. W. (Eds.). (1986). User-Centered System Design: New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Norman, D. (1988, 2013). The design of everyday things Basic Books; MIT Press (British Isles only).

(I am Don Norman. I can't change anything because I like to give primary citations and Wikipedia only allows secondary citations.)

Not scientific?

[edit]

I think the article Human Design opinion forming, not neutral and represent a subtle advertising. Ichsagdirwas (talk) 15:54, 16 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

I'm not a expert, i would like Feedback. Ichsagdirwas (talk) 15:58, 16 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

It strikes me as a meaningless sequence of buzzwords, written by a PR person who doesn't know what "human-centered design" means. (Perhaps it doesn't mean anything - I have no way of telling.) Maproom (talk) 11:12, 20 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education assignment: Intro to Technical Writing

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 8 October 2024 and 23 October 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Doromano1 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Doromano1 (talk) 19:09, 26 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

AI

[edit]

I have flagged AI-generated text here, further info in tag: several edits such as this (2026), this (2025), and This (2024); note WP:AISIGNS across the board e.g. superficial analyses, vocab distro typical of LLM output, etc Gnomingstuff (talk) 19:03, 4 June 2026 (UTC)Reply