Talk:Houssa

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted on 31 December 2014 by reviewer MatthewVanitas (talk · contribs).

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Gao

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Multiple sources I've come across in the past few days identify Houssa unambiguously with Gao, which is exactly where Mungo Park says Houssa should be. None of them are great sources and I don't especially want to add them to the article. (For reference: https://archive.aramcoworld.com/issue/200502/the.river.htm ; http://www.culture-islam.fr/contrees/sahel/mungo-park-rapport-des-marchands-sur-le-pays-du-moyen-niger-jenne-massina-jinbala-tombouctou-gao-houssa-et-les-royaumes-voltaiques-1799 ; https://books.google.com/books?id=J6otAwAAQBAJ&pg=RA1-PA361&lpg=RA1-PA361#v=onepage&q&f=false ) Nonetheless, as it stands, this "Houssa is clearly a figment of the Western imagination" line the article takes doesn't exactly look tenable. Are there any people with access to better sources or a good knowledge of the region and the period who could clean this up a bit? PhainetaiMoi (talk) 05:29, 27 December 2019 (UTC)Reply