Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a25bc80d2f412a9c

Jump to content

Talk:Host adapter

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

2007

[edit]

Adaptec, Areca , Tekram, Promise Technology makes host adapters... page contains too much jargon —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.163.131.105 (talk) 15:21, 26 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

USB host

[edit]

USB host redirects here. What is a USB host?. I suggest that is something similar to USB on the go, but applied to any device, mainly HDD media players.--Diamondland (talk) 14:13, 3 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Quite simply USB host is a computer that has USB port. I've changed this unfortunate redirect. --Kubanczyk (talk) 18:23, 18 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Purpose

[edit]

Besides the mention of host adapters being used for connecting fiber channel, SCSI and many others, a mention of the components that the adapter is composed of and other functions that host adapters perform would be a good addition to this article — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akshayfarcry (talkcontribs) 05:59, 7 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

SAN?

[edit]

When I think of HBAs, I immmediately think of Storage Area Networks or SANs. This is especially true for Fibre channel, which is referenced here as the primary technology to utilize HBAs. Shouldn't the article reference SAN in some way? Rantorr (talk) 22:01, 1 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Article title

[edit]

Hello! In my opinion, the article should be renamed to Host bus adapter as that's by far a more common name for the described technology. Any objections, please?  Dsimic (talk | contribs) 12:42, 28 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

I agree. --Jefe2000 (talk) 15:49, 5 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
Me too. And I would add that the "main article" SCSI host adapters should be merged into this one --Lenehey (talk) 22:36, 18 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Assumption?

[edit]

The article mentions the host as the host "computer", but the term "computer" seems unnatural at the level of detail of individual cards and buses. What is really meant by the term "computer"? Does this mean CPU, or does this mean something a little more expansive, such as motherboard?  Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.247.162.60 (talk) 04:48, 18 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hm, please don't get me wrong, but this might be called hair-splitting. It should be clear to virtually anyone what comprises a typical computer.  Dsimic (talk | contribs) 07:05, 16 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
Definitely hairsplitting --Lenehey (talk) 22:36, 18 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Legacy?

[edit]

Does this page mostly describe legacy technology? I'm not saying that HBAs are dead but since Ethernet has gotten so much faster, who's still selecting this technology for new datacenters? I am not enough of an expert to say but I think some mention of this technology being "legacy" should be included. --Lenehey (talk) 22:36, 18 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

"Ide controller" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

The redirect Ide controller has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 February 19 § Ide controller until a consensus is reached. 8BitBros (talk edits) 19:45, 19 February 2026 (UTC)Reply