Talk:Hose
Add topic| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hose article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | The following reference(s) may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
Hoses are very common in garden use — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.226.135.246 (talk) 00:54, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
improvement on technology
[edit]A lot of westerners abandoned the cone-style hose to wrap around the hose from the 1950s. Cylinders simply do not work, they tangle the hose and break it. They also didn't improve watsoever on this technology. They managed to go as far as nylon and a valve. However on high pressure these valves break. I've bought fishtanks from them that literally do not work. So I got this idea of putting an old hose within the hose. No leakage occurs, it won't destroyed your mouth piece attachment which breaks usually do to varrying water pressure from the leak. Varrying water pressure creates force, if its not compact the hose will destroy the valve and the mouthpiece, both ends... So now you can use the hose like a facet basically. Its a simply process of tubing a small old hose within a large one at the end of the mouth piece..so it barely goes into the facet. Easily done, and efficient. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.255.25.193 (talk) 13:23, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
Polyethylene
[edit]Is repeated twice in the intro.--عبد المؤمن (talk) 18:11, 15 September 2013 (UTC)