Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2822732edd5d858

Jump to content

Talk:Horsforth Hall Park

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Esemgee in topic Article Split Suggestion

Article Split Suggestion

[edit]

There is a large amount of information about the history of a now demolished building, which I don't imagine is what someone is hoping for when they look for an article about the park where it once stood.

A new article about Horsforth Hall would allow for the detailed history to be kept, perhaps with information about the building's architecture and anything else worth noting. (if that information is avaliable anywhere). And it would give space for the current article to be fully focused on the park itself, with just a couple sentences on it's namesake. ---- D'n'B-t -- 18:09, 23 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Would there be sufficient information on the park? Keith D (talk) 19:23, 23 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
I should think so the park has enough features and regular events to be worth documenting. I suppose it depends what you'd consider to be a minimum amount of information in an article about a park. Besides, if there weren't sufficient information about the park, there'd still be a case for moving the buildings history from Horsforth Hall Park to Horsforth Hall. ---- D'n'B-t -- 19:55, 23 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

As this article is mainly about the hall, it should be renamed Horsforth Hall and reorganised. The park material could be moved to the end. Esemgee (talk) 16:37, 16 February 2025 (UTC)Reply