Talk:Horch
Add topic | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
does anyone have more details/price range for the collectible nazi scarf
Is this comment about the Soviets stealing a factory and bringing it back to the USSR to making Trabants reliable? This is not documented anywhere.
- The Trabant factory was referred to as the Sachsenring Trabant since it fell under the Soviet sector of Germany post World War II, and it was used initially to build the first Trabant P50 model car. mkamat 21:22, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
Pullman
[edit]I would think the Horch Pullman was quite a popular model but I don't know much about it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Parable1991 (talk • contribs) 02:53, 18 December 2006 (UTC).
horch sport cabriolet firefighting vehicle
[edit]
Is it worth having a section that references this custom Horch?
http://tabekpuang.blogspot.com/2015/01/inilah-kereta-bomba-yang-aneh-dan-luar.html?m=1
it's gorgeous and unique
Reason for stopping the production
[edit]What's the real reason the production of the Sachsenring P240 stopped? This article says
As the Soviet Administration inexplicably banned the foreign exportation of the P240, the East German economic administration decided to stop production of the vehicle.
The Sachsenring P240 says in a nutshell that it was due to the decision that the CSSR should be the country from the Eastern Block to produce luxury cars. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.198.218.209 (talk) 13:47, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
- @82.198.218.209 You pretty much answered your own question, didn't you? The Soviet Union thought only Czechoslovakia should export luxury cars, so East Germany shouldn't, so the Soviets forbade East Germany from doing so. Therefore the East Germans stopped manufacturing the P240. In essence, both articles say the same thing.
- The only difference is that the other article has a more complete explanation, so the word “inexplicable” in this article isn't strictly true. But then again, without checking edit timestamps, maybe that wasn't known when this article was written.
- Either way, that's a one-word quibble that doesn't change the fact that your question contains its own answer. --CRConrad (talk) 16:10, 10 May 2026 (UTC)