Talk:Hopper balloon

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Untitled

Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The term "cloudhopper" is a trademark for a particular manufacturer. Whereas "hopper" is the more generic term. It might make sense to have a discussion of the terminology an the origins of the "cloudhopper" term on the "hopper" page. Also, it is not clear to me what information belongs on this page that doesn't also belong on the more general one. Information specific to the trademarked product can be put into a separate section in the more generic article. So, I suggest that the info here be folded into hopper balloon and that this page become a redirect there. Blimpguy 17:32, 23 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Historically, workhorse hopper balloons of 1930s were gas-filled, shouldn't hot air be removed from the lead? NVO (talk) 02:41, 23 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

A page that knows where it met you.

Talk:Hopper balloon

Untitled