Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a237f297d99518aa

Jump to content

Talk:Hood unit

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 2 years ago by ConnieC420 in topic Strange subject range?

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Hood unit/CommentsTalk:Hood unit/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

This article badly needs an expansion to non-North American railways. For example, the Russian TEM-7 is a hood unit built in thousands of examples. Other hood units were built by CKD in Czechia, in China, and in Australia. Jim (talk) 18:36, 1 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 18:36, 1 December 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 18:14, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Removed line

[edit]

Deleted "This was originally done to avoid union conflicts, as the high nose ensured that two crewmen (one on each side of the cab) were required in order to see both sides of the track.[citation needed]" Not only is it uncited (after 13 years!), but it also is historically nonsensical. Union contracts with US railroads up until about 1970 mandated a five-man crew whether there was any need for them or not (management especially resented having to pay flagmen, whose job was long obsolete). Solicitr (talk) 23:49, 5 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Strange subject range?

[edit]

This article mentions North America, which is pretty unobjectionable, and then several European countries at random, and then South Korea, China and Indonesia.

I do not think this focus is particularly useful, and is in fact narrow - most locomotives mentioned in the Indonesian, Turkish, and Korean sections are US-made exports that are relatively globally distributed.

I think the article would cover more ground if this was abstracted into being by continent, too - all European rail networks have some variety of hood unit, and Asia, Africa, and South America have a great many US-built export designs that could be covered, without listing individual countries as headings. ConnieC420 (talk) 20:55, 15 July 2024 (UTC)Reply