Talk:Holy Trinity Icon

NPOV dispute

This article contains a great deal of contradictory material--and I am hardly have the expertise to adjudicate. In particular: "George Gabriel's writings on icons are heretical, as is this Wikipedia article." Could a better source be found for the information? Perhaps something that is widely accepted in the Orthodox faith as well as scholarly work? Declaring a Wikipedia article heretical is clearly non NPOV.Samuelet (talk) 20:04, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Resolved, tag removed John (talk) 01:48, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

im not very good at discussion protocol, but this article is heretical horse manure. the hospitality of abraham was always understood as a trinitarian representation. the so called angels are the trinity. you should delete the whole subject or write something within orthodox theology.

Capitalization

The capitalization of icon in the article's title implies that it is a Proper noun: about a particular object but it is not. Holy Trinity icon is not a very descriptive title either. I am proposing that it be changed to Holy Trinity iconography, but am open to other suggestions. Editor2020 (talk) 00:02, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

AAARGH, no. Iconography is NOT the painting of icons. The title is fine, with lc "i", or "Holy Trinity in icons". Johnbod (talk) 02:10, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

So you are suggesting changing the title to either Holy Trinity icons or Holy Trinity in icons then? Anyone else? Editor2020 (talk) 19:05, 20 September 2021 (UTC)