Talk:Hmar language

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hmar language. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.censusindia.gov.in/Census_Data_2011/Census_Data_Online/Language/partb.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120226143103/http://www.hmarrunpui.com/ to http://www.hmarrunpui.com/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060424100356/http://www.manipuronline.com/Features/June2002/hmar11_2.htm to http://www.manipuronline.com/Features/June2002/hmar11_2.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:17, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Suspicious edits

Looks not 100% right, the edits made in late 2022. Someone knowledgeable plase check. Tuvalkin (talk) 04:31, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

Likely AI-generated content

Hi -- I added the AI generated tag regarding this massive addition earlier this year. It displays just so many indicators of LLM use, and the edit summary does not inspire much confidence as to how thoroughly it was reviewed, and so all that review -- hallucinations, tone, etc. -- must be done. Gnomingstuff (talk) 17:28, 8 September 2025 (UTC)