Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22b67048d433524

Jump to content

Talk:Hit wicket

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 20 years ago by Wisden17 in topic Untitled

Untitled

[edit]

Is a batsman can be given out hit wicket on a delivery above waist height? Added a link for the disintegrating bat, as he could not have been given out Hit Wicket. Take a look at the link. --Wisden17 13:54, 6 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

In Kent v Sussex, Gravenend, 1866 G Wells hit the stumps before Bennett delivered the ball, but umpire Dean gave him out on the grounds that since the ball ceases to be dead as soon as the bowler starts his run, he batsman's action must count from the same moment. Tintin (talk) 14:13, 6 April 2006 (UTC)Reply
Which of course is correct, under Law 35 --Wisden17 14:29, 6 April 2006 (UTC)Reply
Doesn't 35.2.e prevent that now ? Tintin (talk) 17:14, 6 April 2006 (UTC)Reply
Not exactly, I should have said that from today the bowler needs to have entered his delivery stride, I actually misread what you had put earlier. The point of 35.2.e is not that the batsman cannot be out unless the ball is delivered, but he can't be out in those circumstances where the bowler enters his delivery stride and then doesn't bowl the ball (e.g. stops to try and, mistakenly, run-out the non-striker). What you have to remember is that once the batsman is out the ball is dead, so Law 35.2.e will not be relevant in those circumstances. --Wisden17 17:28, 6 April 2006 (UTC)Reply