Talk:History of Iowa/GA1

GA review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: ActuallyElite (talk · contribs) 20:44, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

Reviewer: A.Cython (talk · contribs) 03:41, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Definitely a solid effort and a great work here. Unfortunately, there are a bit too many unsupported statements and partial source information. Thus, I have to quickfail based on WP:GAFAIL#1,3.

• It has, or needs, cleanup banners that are unquestionably still valid. These include {{cleanup}}, {{POV}}, {{unreferenced}} or large numbers of {{citation needed}}, {{clarify}}, or similar tags (See also {{QF}})
• it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;

I placed 9 citation needed tags; I also placed some page needed, as this is needed for the verification during the GAR. At minimum, every paragraph must end with an inline citation. Moreover, I strongly urge you to provide as much as possible information of sources, e.g., isbn numbers, urls to book info from publisher, etc. Such information is essential for verification and this info is just as page numbers. Such information should be in the article before the GAR is initiated. Once you have provided this information please submit it as GAN. A.Cython(talk) 03:41, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.