Talk:History of CAD software

This page should not be speedy deleted because...

This page should not be speedily deleted because I just moved the section "History" from the Computer-aided design page into this page to expand it --Camoz87 (talk) 19:46, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

@Camoz87: My mistake. CentreLeftRight ✉ 20:00, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

Lead section is shorter now, remove tag?

Any objection? -- Yae4 (talk) 15:40, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

I've removed it. It could actually be a bit longer. — Newslinger talk 16:47, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

I think this section " CATIA is more popular, among the end users, for its better surface designing characteristics. That's why it is most widely used in automobile and aerospace industries" needs citation. As is right now it is just an opinion. 147.161.129.100 (talk) 16:50, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

Re: ‎2000s: Failed verification. Claim not supported by source page

​From text at: https://www.psmarketresearch.com/market-analysis/cad-software-market

"With the increasing availability of computing technologies at low prices and the shift of industry from personal computer to cloud and mobile computing, barriers to entry have considerably reduced for new players in the market, characterized by increased competition among existing and new players. Market consolidation due to complementary products and technologies and the possibility of players offering CAD software for various applications are expected to further increase competition in the CAD software market in the near future."

From Table of contents (must click the tab):

4.3.3 Restraints
4.3.3.1 Availability of free and open-source CAD software
4.3.3.2 High cost of advanced and 3D CAD software
4.3.3.3 Impact analysis of restraints on market forecast

=> Availability of free and open-source CAD software and high costs of advanced and 3D CAD software may restrain the growth of the CAD software market.

-- Yae4 (talk) 00:43, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Thanks! I've changed the citation link to the table of contents page to make it clearer for editors who don't have access to the full paper. — Newslinger talk 03:10, 10 September 2019 (UTC)