Talk:HistoAtlas

[Untitled]

I think this article should be flagged for its promotional tone. It looks a lot like a press release, the words choice and tone exceed the informational mission and reached the showcase spot. Am I the only one to think that ? Lakhsim (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 13:26, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

This author created the article with a CSD and a contest (hang-on) tag in it; knowing it was probably going to be tagged. This article does nothing but promote another website.chiefhuggybear (talk)

The article tries to give a genuine description of the website and is meant be an explenation of what the website contains. It explain what the website is for and not to function as an add for the website but as a guide for people who are interested in this kind of information. It contains portions of an article I made about the website a few months ago, so it might sound a bit to enthusiastic. I did not know that it was going to be tagged because it is the first time I have made such an article about a website. I have added the hang-on tag so the administrators will first take a look at the article so it is not destroyed without furter ado. User:dasfenomeenich —Preceding undated comment was added at 00:18, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

As reviewing administrator, I think the article indicates at least some importance, so not a speedy.See user talk page for advice. needs references. DGG (talk) 12:18, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Project dead?

The link to the site is dead and I have been unable to find a new location. I wonder if this project is still alive?Bill (talk) 02:41, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

The link to the site remains dead and I've also not been able to find the new location.--CarlsonC (talk) 01:14, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

Not significant

I'm very in doubt that this fits Wikipedia's notability criteria for web content, so this might be an unnecessary article. EndTheWikiEditor (talk) 04:12, 19 July 2024 (UTC)