Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2416de90d5097fe

Jump to content

Talk:Hiroki

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 19 years ago by Hoary in topic Er, are you sure?

Er, are you sure?

[edit]

Is it really desirable to have a disambig page for every frequently occurring Japanese (or other) personal name? Yes, I can imagine some benefits if they're edited conscientiously. However, I fear that such pages will be half-baked, with lots of articles unlinked to, leading to the impression that those articles don't exist. -- Hoary 05:46, 26 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Sure! There are articles on Alan, Bertram, Gilbert, Akira, and lots more. I only put in links to existing articles. Lots of room for more. Fg2 06:13, 26 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I know. From that lot, I chose Bertram. Click it, and see what's there. Now search for "Bertram". One thing Bertram is not is a disambig for Bertram Somebodies (a Bertroid parallel to David (disambiguation)). Does anybody want to make it into one? If anybody does, is he or she going to continue? If not, who's going to take over? -- Hoary 06:43, 26 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Have a look at this version of David (disambiguation). It's a good example of how a small start can grow over the years. Conceding that Hiroki will not grow like that, I still think it's worthwhile. And disambiguation isn't the only function of articles on names; discussions of meanings, and prominent holders of the name who influenced parents to select it for their daughters and sons, are just a couple of possibilities. Fg2 06:57, 26 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Well, OK. But I fear that articles such as this will on average never get more than half the number of names that belong to them. -- Hoary 11:02, 26 October 2006 (UTC)Reply