Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bulgaria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bulgaria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BulgariaWikipedia:WikiProject BulgariaTemplate:WikiProject BulgariaBulgaria
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
@Shadow4ya, please provide a more reliable source of this statement. This claim is from the website of the Hilandar monastery, where it is not supported by evidence from the linguistic material of the fragments or information gleaned from the scientific literature cited there. Moreover, the studies of Jagić, Grigorovich, Sreznevsky, Karsky, as well as the study of Kulbakin mentioned as source here and on Hilendar's website, do not contain similar findings about the origin of the fragments. What these researchers have in common is that they define the sheets as an ancient Cyrillic monument of the Old Church Slavonic language, without defining it as Bulgarian, Serbian or of other specific Sought Slavic origin. If you have other reliable sources available to support this claim with evidence from the linguistic material of the monument, please cite them. Otherwise I suppose we should change it to Old Church Slavonic manuscript. Thank you in advance. Nauka (talk) 15:43, 4 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
