Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a255e546be9aa140

Jump to content

Talk:High Speed 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 2 months ago by 10mmsocket in topic Lack of info about costs and benefits
Former good articleHigh Speed 1 was one of the Engineering and technology good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 18, 2007Good article nomineeListed
February 22, 2010Good article reassessmentKept
July 11, 2025Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

CTRL or London St Pancras Highspeed?

[edit]

Is this article about the piece of physical infrastructure known as the Channel Tunnel Rail Link, or is it about the company known as London St Pancras Highspeed? It currently seems to be conflating the two things.

I would suggest these two concepts are separated out into two separate articles. Kennethmac2000 (talk) 18:02, 21 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Article review

[edit]

It has been a while since this article was reviewed, so I took a look and saw lots of uncited statements, including entire paragraphs. Should this article go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 02:36, 29 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

GA Reassessment

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 16:52, 11 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Uncited statements, including entire paragraphs. Z1720 (talk) 18:37, 11 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Phase 2 in 2016?

[edit]

The "Building Cost" section notes "Its phase one was completed in 2007 and phase two in 2016." and cites First Interim Evaluation of the Impacts of High Speed 1 but the only mention of 2016 in the pdf is about regeneration around Stratford International. Page 18 of the pdf says "Phase 1 of HS1 from the Channel Tunnel to Fawkham Junction opened in September 2003" which is different to the 2007 phase 1 in the article. Page 40 of the pdf point to HS1 Phase 2 being between 2006 Q3 and Q4. This is possibly when construction finished but before the line opened to passengers. Page 93 of the pdf says there was a "phased opening of the route" and "Section 1 opened in 2003 between the Channel Tunnel and north Kent terminating at Waterloo. Section 2 opened in 2007 between a newly built Ebbsfleet station in Kent and London St Pancras." The information in the article is different to the information in the pdf that the article cites. 2A00:23C5:6A17:801:C202:3417:47F1:771B (talk) 01:53, 14 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Lack of info about costs and benefits

[edit]

The article doesn't tell you what the cost was or who paid it. It also doen't tell you what the economic benefits that were expected. It seems like a pure vanity project, which has not eVen been useful as a bad example ~2026-17029-13 (talk) 14:30, 26 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Well, the solution is really easy - as you seem to care so much about the accuracy of the article, add the information yourself, properly sourced of course. 10mmsocket (talk) 14:51, 26 May 2026 (UTC)Reply