Talk:High Places
Add topic| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Process section has NPOV problems
[edit]Reads like a positive record review. Someone try and neutralize the text in that section. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.237.165.144 (talk) 05:56, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
-agreed, also too much trivia in the vein of "the morning before they played their third show, Rob ate a bowl of corn flakes with chocolate milk"
Notability
[edit]An article about this group was deleted in Dec 2006. I believe they have progressed sufficiently to establish notability under WP:MUS. They have toured nationally and been reviewed in multiple independent publications, plus been featured by eMusic which is a major online music retailer. Wwwhatsup (talk) 01:56, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
Article
[edit]Give me a couple more days and I'll add more. Feel free to contribute. Wwwhatsup (talk) 01:56, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
Discography
[edit]Shouldn't they get a discography section now that they have a (admittedly download-only) album? Nigel the frog (talk) 02:25, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
Disambiguation Needed
[edit]Disambiguation is needed for this title, as evidenced by the link from the Hezekiah article. 67.176.181.188 (talk) 17:35, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
- I've just piped that link thru to High place - that should suffice. Wwwhatsup (talk) 08:55, 13 December 2009 (UTC)