Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a3fee5866c3ad806

Jump to content

Talk:High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 6 years ago by 24.143.229.211 in topic 'Intel' Frame

Importance rating

[edit]

Until we know more about the scope of the suit, and how it affects the economy of cali, we cannot give it a high rating for the cali/sfba projects. this needs a lot more information, aside from its rating.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 00:27, 29 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Title

[edit]

This isn't a proper noun or official/formal title, so shouldn't the article title be lower case (High-tech employee antitrust litigation)?--ukexpat (talk) 20:35, 26 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

There's no magic formula to what makes something a proper noun, but to me High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation is, in the appropriate context, perfectly acceptable as a proper noun in the same way that other borderline examples like "Cuban Missile Crisis" are acceptable proper nouns. Rolf H Nelson (talk) 02:33, 27 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

'Intel' Frame

[edit]

There is a frame with information on Intel corporation at the bottom of this article. It appears out of place and unrelated to the article.  Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.143.229.211 (talk) 07:43, 9 July 2020 (UTC)Reply