Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga
Latest comment: 3 months ago7 comments3 people in discussion
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. You can locate your hook here. No further edits should be made to this page.
Overall: Created within a day of nomination, 1800 characters long. I didn't recognise any of the sources but TorrentFreak, the article's primary source, is considered reliable in this topic, and Screen Rant is considered marginally reliable, both per the RSP. AnimeMojo I have no idea about, searching the RSP and the list at the anime and manga subproject yielded no results. It is used in a handful of other articles, and here the only thing it is the only source for is to say that HiAnime was likely popular for a no-fee model and a lack of licensing limits, which seems, if not immediately obvious to an untrained observer, quite intuitive, so I'm willing to accept it. I am not sure why the SimilarWeb source is directly cited, as I am skeptical of its reliability, and I would think it only gains reliability through the mention in TorrentFreak, so I would err on the side of that being removed. An Earwig copyright check brings up a false positive to a blog post that copies from the KissAnime article (written by this article's author!), and other than that the highest figure is 13.0%, so I think there are no copyright issues here. The hook is sourced and, I think, interesting, and so I can provisionally approve it (although would 'piracy anime streaming site' be better?), but I would like the sourcing issue to be dealt with, or if you think that all two mentioned sources are reliable, to explain why. Thanks for your work here! --LivelyRatification (talk) 09:17, 17 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thanks, I did a bit of looking and was able to find a mention of SimilarWeb in Forbes, so happy to accept it. AnimeMojo is cited for a minor (and fairly obvious) claim as previously stated so I'm happy to accept that as well, so I will approve this hook. --LivelyRatification (talk) 21:55, 17 March 2026 (UTC)Reply